Instead of reform

“Manipulative or incompetent”: Bowing to the ORF

Incumbent Director General Ingrid Thurnher and her successor as ORF head, Clemens Pig, are likely pleased with the results of the “Future Forum.”(Bild: APA/ROLAND SCHLAGER)

The much-heralded Future Forum was supposed to lay the groundwork for a comprehensive ORF reform. What emerged, above all, was a wish list from Küniglberg. The deeply annoyed private media outlets were fobbed off with vague promises of cooperation.

Even in the run-up to the event, skepticism in the media industry was high. Can a two-day “Future Forum” with hundreds of participants really lay the groundwork for a viable ORF reform? After the presentation of the results, the sobering answer is: hardly.

Already after the first day, their representatives were considering a walkout. In protest against the forum’s agenda and direction, there was talk of staying away from the second day en masse. But the collective boycott fell apart. One by one, they returned on Friday after all. The pressure on the already severely battered media market is simply too great.

 Fulfills Nearly All of ORF’s WishesDuring the subsequent presentation, it became clear why there is so much anger: nearly everything that ORF Director General Ingrid Thurnher had demanded in the run-up to the forum is now reflected in the working groups’ findings.

In the future, the ORF should be allowed to produce content exclusively and primarily for the internet. The proposals also call for greater freedom across all digital channels, direct interaction with the audience, and dedicated content for young people. The existing ban on forums is also set to be lifted. This should give the broadcaster significantly more leeway when it comes to online content.

The proposed AI mandate is also included in the results: it is to be enshrined in law and linked to shared data, infrastructure, marketing, and cooperation models. The discoverability of public service content is also to be enhanced, and the archiving regulations expanded. In short: The “digital liberation” Thurnher had hoped for was almost entirely endorsed by the forum.

The SPÖ, NEOS, and the Greens spoke out in favor of online-only offerings. While private media outlets fear for their reach and revenue, politicians celebrated above all the “many ideas from the cooperation groups.” “It seems as though these are already concrete plans,” said one participant, describing the mood.

It is disconcerting to speak of a consensus when key proposals from private media have, in fact, been largely ignored throughout the entire process.

Philipp König, CEO von kronehit

Bild: kronehit

Private media are being fobbed off
Meanwhile, private providers are to be placated with a “cooperation obligation,” info-content sharing, a joint digital marketplace, and an AI alliance. Everything is supposed to be done together somehow in the future. From the private media’s perspective, this is almost a provocation given the already privileged position of the license-fee-funded ORF.

Behind the scenes, the frustration is immense. Take Kronehit CEO Philipp König, for example: “Talking about a consensus is disconcerting when the private media’s key concerns and proposed solutions have effectively been ignored throughout the entire process,” says the experienced media executive, who did not attend today’s forum. His scathing assessment of the forum: “Manipulative or incompetent—I can choose whichever I like.”

“The ORF’s wishes are being catered to”
He warns above all of the consequences for the entire media market. “A responsible media policy must always keep the impact on the overall market in mind—otherwise, we weaken Austria’s position as a media hub,” warns König. It is “regrettable that only the ORF’s wishes were catered to here.” After all, true diversity of opinion can only exist through a healthy balance between the core mission of public broadcasting and a strong private media sector.

For now, these are merely the results from discussion groups. Politicians will ultimately decide which parts actually make it into the law. However, the “Zukunftsforum” is intended to serve as the basis for the new law. For now, though, it has primarily shown who was able to get its way: the ORF.