Media Barred
Trump Bars Media: Outlets Pull the Emergency Brake
The dispute between U.S. President Donald Trump and several major media outlets continues to escalate. After Trump revoked several media outlets’ access to the White House, the affected newsrooms announced they would file a lawsuit. Now other major U.S. networks are responding as well: For the time being, they will no longer report on certain Trump appearances.
Following the exclusion of CNN and other media outlets from the White House, four additional major U.S. broadcasters are limiting their coverage of the president for the time being. ABC, CBS, Fox News, and NBC, along with CNN, have jointly declared that they will no longer report on Trump’s appearances for the time being.
The networks are part of a so-called press pool, whose journalists travel to meet with the president on a rotating basis. As a result of this decision, coverage of certain appearances by the U.S. president will be limited for the time being.
Major Players File an Emergency Motion in Court
It had previously been reported that CNN, MS NOW, and the news portal “Politico” intend to file a lawsuit against Trump’s ban from the White House. “We informed the government this morning that we will file a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights,” the three media outlets stated jointly on the platform X.
“No government should be allowed to restrict a media organization simply because it disapproves of its reporting,” the networks stated. The lawsuit is also intended to defend the principle “that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes.”
According to the three media outlets, the White House revoked the journalists’ press credentials “without notice or due process” because the government “objected to our reporting.” If no action is taken against this, “it threatens press freedom and the public’s right to independent journalism free from government influence,” the media outlets stated. According to them, the lawsuit is an emergency motion, intended to ensure that a court addresses the case as quickly as possible.
Trump: “A Threat to Our National Security”
Trump subsequently defended his move on his online platform, Truth Social. The White House’s decision was “not an attack on the free press, something I value,” the president wrote. Instead, he said, it was an attack on “fake news,” which was spreading “like cancer” in the U.S.
This “fake news” is “corrupt, deliberate, ubiquitous, fully coordinated, and completely out of control,” he said. Trump described it as “a threat to our national security” that must be stopped “now.”
More Media Outlets in the Crosshairs
Trump had already unexpectedly barred CNN, MS NOW, and “Politico” from the White House effective immediately on Friday. He did not provide a specific reason for the action against the three media outlets. He merely stated that the media should be prevented from “spreading fabrications and lies.”
At the same time, Trump threatened other media outlets with similar consequences. “Other media outlets that spread misinformation will follow,” he wrote. It remains unclear how long the ban will remain in effect. In the Oval Office, Trump cited the “New York Times” and the “Washington Post,” among others, as further examples of “fake news.” However, he did not impose an explicit ban on the two newspapers.
Criticism of the President’s Actions
Critics view the ban as an attempt at intimidation and an attack on press freedom. Journalists from the three affected media outlets were already barred from entering the White House over the weekend. The White House Correspondents’ Association condemned the move as unconstitutional. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees, among other things, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of expression.
Trump has long taken a hard line against media outlets he views as critical of him. Last year, the AP news agency was excluded from the pool of traveling journalists after it refused to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”
Trump also repeatedly attacks journalists personally when he does not like their questions. Favorable coverage, on the other hand, is expressly praised by the president.
This article has been automatically translated,
read the original article here.

Kronen Zeitung als bevorzugte Google-Quelle hinzufügen 







Willkommen in unserer Community! Eingehende Beiträge werden geprüft und anschließend veröffentlicht. Bitte achten Sie auf Einhaltung unserer Netiquette und AGB. Für ausführliche Diskussionen steht Ihnen ebenso das krone.at-Forum zur Verfügung. Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.
Hinweis in eigener Sache: Das krone.at-Forum präsentiert sich ab sofort in neuem Design! Wir freuen uns über konstruktives Feedback. Damit die Diskussionen in den Kommentarbereichen beim jeweiligen Thema bleiben, können Sie uns Rückmeldungen hier hinterlassen.
User-Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des Betreibers/der Redaktion bzw. von Krone Multimedia (KMM) wieder. In diesem Sinne distanziert sich die Redaktion/der Betreiber von den Inhalten in diesem Diskussionsforum. KMM behält sich insbesondere vor, gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende, den guten Sitten oder der Netiquette widersprechende bzw. dem Ansehen von KMM zuwiderlaufende Beiträge zu löschen, diesbezüglichen Schadenersatz gegenüber dem betreffenden User geltend zu machen, die Nutzer-Daten zu Zwecken der Rechtsverfolgung zu verwenden und strafrechtlich relevante Beiträge zur Anzeige zu bringen (siehe auch AGB). Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.