Animal cruelty trial
Letter carrier delivers “surprise” verdict
Would an alleged animal abuser have believed that he could trick the court or at least avert the verdict? Or did he just forget about his trial in Wels? He simply didn't show up. Now he will find out when he opens the mail whether he will be punished or not.
Kronen Zeitung als bevorzugte Google-Quelle hinzufügen Guilty or acquitted? A defendant can wait with bated breath for the postman. The 34-year-old skipped his trial at Wels Regional Court on Thursday - but he was still unable to prevent the judge's verdict. Because the summons was demonstrably delivered in person, the defendant had already been questioned once and all deadlines had been met, a "judgment in absentia" could be pronounced.
Dog thrown through car
The 34-year-old is facing up to two years in prison for allegedly beating his dog in Bad Goisern and throwing it across the car because the animal had not obeyed. He then allegedly attacked a courageous witness, but did not injure him.
This article has been automatically translated,
read the original article here.
Da dieser Artikel älter als 18 Monate ist, ist zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt kein Kommentieren mehr möglich.
Wir laden Sie ein, bei einer aktuelleren themenrelevanten Story mitzudiskutieren: Themenübersicht.
Bei Fragen können Sie sich gern an das Community-Team per Mail an forum@krone.at wenden.