After misdiagnosis
Styria: Part of healthy woman’s lung removed
Following the dramatic case in Upper Austria, there has reportedly been a similar incident at a hospital in Styria. A 48-year-old woman had part of her lung removed after a serious misdiagnosis – even though she had never had cancer.
Kronen Zeitung als bevorzugte Google-Quelle hinzufügen According to her lawyer, Karin Prutsch-Lang, the woman had already been admitted to LKH Graz II in September 2024 with fever, chills, and severe weakness. Tests showed inflammation but no tumor. Nevertheless, a tissue sample was taken. The diagnosis later came back as adenocarcinoma – lung cancer.
Suspected tumor
The doctors recommended immediate surgery at a private clinic, even though there were other findings that indicated only inflammation, not a tumor. Nevertheless, part of the lung was removed shortly thereafter. After the procedure, it turned out that the patient was completely healthy. In reality, she never had cancer.
My client accuses the doctors of simply accepting this histological finding, which did not match the other results.
Anwältin Karin Prutsch-Lang
"My client accuses the doctors of simply accepting these histological findings, which did not match the other results, and of making a premature diagnosis of a tumor, which resulted in her losing part of her lung," attorney Prutsch-Lang told the "Krone" newspaper.
The consequences for the woman are serious. She now suffers from a large scar with numbness, limited resilience, and severe anxiety. A 17-centimeter-long scar now adorns her chest, and she needs help to cope with her everyday life.
Fearing death and not being able to see her children grow up, she had even written farewell letters to her family before the operation, reports the lawyer – more on this in the news magazine "BLICKWECHSEL" (tomorrow, Thursday, 9:15 p.m., live on ServusTV).
Treatment "lege artis"
The hospital association (Kages) counters the woman's lawsuit by stating that both the histopathological examination and the treatment and information provided were lege artis, and rejects the allegations.
The case is reminiscent of the latest report from Upper Austria. In that case, a 30-year-old woman had her uterus completely removed even though she was in perfect health.
This article has been automatically translated,
read the original article here.
Willkommen in unserer Community! Eingehende Beiträge werden geprüft und anschließend veröffentlicht. Bitte achten Sie auf Einhaltung unserer Netiquette und AGB. Für ausführliche Diskussionen steht Ihnen ebenso das krone.at-Forum zur Verfügung. Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.
Hinweis in eigener Sache: Das krone.at-Forum präsentiert sich ab sofort in neuem Design! Wir freuen uns über konstruktives Feedback. Damit die Diskussionen in den Kommentarbereichen beim jeweiligen Thema bleiben, können Sie uns Rückmeldungen hier hinterlassen.
User-Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des Betreibers/der Redaktion bzw. von Krone Multimedia (KMM) wieder. In diesem Sinne distanziert sich die Redaktion/der Betreiber von den Inhalten in diesem Diskussionsforum. KMM behält sich insbesondere vor, gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende, den guten Sitten oder der Netiquette widersprechende bzw. dem Ansehen von KMM zuwiderlaufende Beiträge zu löschen, diesbezüglichen Schadenersatz gegenüber dem betreffenden User geltend zu machen, die Nutzer-Daten zu Zwecken der Rechtsverfolgung zu verwenden und strafrechtlich relevante Beiträge zur Anzeige zu bringen (siehe auch AGB). Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.